Nepal vs Uganda: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nepal
6,633 t
in 2024
Uganda
6,166 t
in 2024
Nepal rank
107th
Uganda rank
109th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Nepal
- Uganda
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 6,633 t against 6,166 t in Uganda, a difference of 467 t.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Nepal ranks 107th and Uganda ranks 109th of 212 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 77.89 t | 787.78 t | 709.89 t | Uganda |
| 1970s | 922 t | 762.88 t | 159.12 t | Nepal |
| 1980s | 1,139 t | 24.67 t | 1,114 t | Nepal |
| 1990s | 1,795 t | 447.8 t | 1,347 t | Nepal |
| 2000s | 911.6 t | 1,673 t | 761.2 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 4,126 t | 3,128 t | 998 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 8,497 t | 5,233 t | 3,265 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Nepal or Uganda?
- Nepal, at 6,633 t against 6,166 t in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Nepal and Uganda?
- 467 t, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Uganda?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Uganda rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Nepal ranks 107th and Uganda ranks 109th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.