Nicaragua vs Sweden: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nicaragua
25,872 t
in 2022
Sweden
25,417 t
in 2024
Nicaragua rank
79th
Sweden rank
81st
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Nicaragua
- Sweden
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 25,872 t against 25,417 t in Sweden, a difference of 455 t.
Across all 62 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 79th and Sweden ranks 81st of 212 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,586 t | 105,813 t | 104,227 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 4,113 t | 129,966 t | 125,853 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 6,905 t | 95,775 t | 88,870 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 4,484 t | 54,664 t | 50,180 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 6,751 t | 39,419 t | 32,668 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 13,738 t | 31,792 t | 18,054 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 26,893 t | 38,803 t | 11,910 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Nicaragua or Sweden?
- Nicaragua, at 25,872 t against 25,417 t in Sweden as of 2022.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Nicaragua and Sweden?
- 455 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sweden?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do Nicaragua and Sweden rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Nicaragua ranks 79th and Sweden ranks 81st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.