Philippines vs Serbia and Montenegro: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Philippines
93,078 t
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
91,825 t
in 2005
Philippines rank
38th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
39th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Philippines
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 93,078 t against 91,825 t in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 1,253 t.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 38th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 39th of 212 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 110,524 t | 28,250 t | 82,274 t | Philippines |
| 2000s | 118,479 t | 71,865 t | 46,613 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Philippines or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Philippines, at 93,078 t against 91,825 t in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Philippines and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 1,253 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2005.
- How do Philippines and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Philippines ranks 38th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 39th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.