Réunion vs Sao Tome and Principe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Réunion
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Réunion currently reports 61 t against 58 t in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 3 t.
That makes Réunion's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Réunion ranks 185th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 186th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Réunion averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Réunion | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52 t | 42.25 t | 9.75 t | Réunion |
| 2010s | 59.2 t | 49.5 t | 9.7 t | Réunion |
| 2020s | 56.6 t | 66 t | 9.4 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Réunion or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Réunion, at 61 t against 58 t in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Réunion and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 3 t, with Réunion ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Réunion and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Réunion and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Réunion ranks 185th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 186th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.