Rwanda vs Tunisia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Rwanda
7,357 t
in 2024
Tunisia
7,969 t
in 2024
Rwanda rank
105th
Tunisia rank
104th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Rwanda
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 7,969 t against 7,357 t in Rwanda, a difference of 612 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Tunisia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 104th of 212 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 107 t | 4,000 t | 3,893 t | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 127.4 t | 3,236 t | 3,109 t | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 168.3 t | 4,106 t | 3,938 t | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 200.55 t | 3,280 t | 3,079 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 1,142 t | 5,230 t | 4,088 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 2,248 t | 4,950 t | 2,702 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 6,483 t | 5,983 t | 500 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Rwanda or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 7,969 t against 7,357 t in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 612 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Tunisia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Rwanda ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 104th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.