Serbia and Montenegro vs Uruguay: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Serbia and Montenegro
- Uruguay
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 91,825 t against 86,983 t in Uruguay, a difference of 4,842 t.
That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 39th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 212 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia and Montenegro | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28,250 t | 6,450 t | 21,800 t | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 71,865 t | 4,631 t | 67,234 t | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Serbia and Montenegro or Uruguay?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 91,825 t against 86,983 t in Uruguay as of 2005.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Serbia and Montenegro and Uruguay?
- 4,842 t, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Uruguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2005.
- How do Serbia and Montenegro and Uruguay rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 39th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.