Sierra Leone vs Tajikistan: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Sierra Leone
873 t
in 2022
Tajikistan
760 t
in 2024
Sierra Leone rank
151st
Tajikistan rank
154th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Sierra Leone
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 873 t against 760 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 113 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 151st and Tajikistan ranks 154th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 691.25 t | 3,970 t | 3,279 t | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 114.6 t | 1,031 t | 915.93 t | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 818.3 t | 528.8 t | 289.5 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 873 t | 1,468 t | 594.67 t | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Sierra Leone or Tajikistan?
- Sierra Leone, at 873 t against 760 t in Tajikistan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Sierra Leone and Tajikistan?
- 113 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Tajikistan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
- How do Sierra Leone and Tajikistan rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Sierra Leone ranks 151st and Tajikistan ranks 154th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.