Togo vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Togo
4,880 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
4,509 t
in 2024
Togo rank
113th
Zimbabwe rank
115th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Togo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Togo currently reports 4,880 t against 4,509 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 371 t.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Togo ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 212 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Togo averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 58 t | 23,000 t | 22,942 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 305.4 t | 25,667 t | 25,361 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 1,800 t | 29,684 t | 27,884 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 3,372 t | 33,550 t | 30,178 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 2,831 t | 20,797 t | 17,966 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 7,693 t | 23,977 t | 16,284 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 5,133 t | 4,156 t | 977 t | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Togo or Zimbabwe?
- Togo, at 4,880 t against 4,509 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Togo and Zimbabwe?
- 371 t, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Zimbabwe?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2024.
- How do Togo and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Togo ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.