Czechia vs Mali: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita
Czechia
0.0018 t per person
in 2024
Mali
0.0018 t per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
70th
Mali rank
68th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita over time
- Czechia
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0.0018 t per person against 0.0018 t per person in Czechia, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 70th and Mali ranks 68th of 173 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.004 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0032 t per person | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.0028 t per person | 0.0015 t per person | 0.0013 t per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.0028 t per person | 0.001 t per person | 0.0018 t per person | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.0019 t per person | 0.001 t per person | 0.0009 t per person | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per capita, Czechia or Mali?
- Mali, at 0.0018 t per person against 0.0018 t per person in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per capita between Czechia and Mali?
- 0 t per person, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Mali rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per capita?
- Czechia ranks 70th and Mali ranks 68th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.