Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita

Sao Tome and Principe
0.0002 t per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0003 t per person
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
122nd
Zimbabwe rank
119th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Zimbabwe
00.0020.0040.006196119922024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0003 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 173 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0003 t per person 0.0014 t per person 0.0011 t per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0002 t per person 0.0017 t per person 0.0014 t per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0003 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0 t per person Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per capita, Sao Tome and Principe or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0003 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per capita between Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
0.0001 t per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per capita?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-capita/sao-tome-and-principe/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-capita/sao-tome-and-principe/zimbabwe/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,600 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.