Angola vs Equatorial Guinea: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Angola
0.0068 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.0074 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
144th
Equatorial Guinea rank
143rd

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Angola
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0074 t per square kilometre against 0.0068 t per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Angola ranks 144th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 143rd of 173 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 0.004 t per square kilometre 0.0049 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0097 t per square kilometre 0.0049 t per square kilometre 0.0048 t per square kilometre Angola
2020s 0.0097 t per square kilometre 0.0059 t per square kilometre 0.0038 t per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Angola or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0074 t per square kilometre against 0.0068 t per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Angola and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0006 t per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Equatorial Guinea?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Angola and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Angola ranks 144th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 143rd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Equatorial Guinea: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/angola/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/angola/equatorial-guinea/">Angola vs Equatorial Guinea: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.