Antigua and Barbuda vs Solomon Islands: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
163rd
Solomon Islands rank
163rd

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Solomon Islands
00.020.040.060.080.1200220122023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 163rd and Solomon Islands ranks 163rd of 173 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0383 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0381 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0077 t per square kilometre 0.0217 t per square kilometre 0.0139 t per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 0.021 t per square kilometre 0.0154 t per square kilometre 0.0056 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Solomon Islands?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Solomon Islands?
0 t per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Solomon Islands?
20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Solomon Islands rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 163rd and Solomon Islands ranks 163rd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Solomon Islands: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/solomon-islands/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Solomon Islands: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.