Argentina vs Iceland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Argentina
0.0176 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0193 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
127th
Iceland rank
124th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Iceland
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0193 t per square kilometre against 0.0176 t per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 0.0017 t per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Argentina ranks 127th and Iceland ranks 124th of 173 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0018 t per square kilometre 0.0346 t per square kilometre 0.0328 t per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.0026 t per square kilometre 0.0572 t per square kilometre 0.0547 t per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0032 t per square kilometre 0.0572 t per square kilometre 0.0539 t per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0089 t per square kilometre 0.0389 t per square kilometre 0.0299 t per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0124 t per square kilometre 0.0349 t per square kilometre 0.0225 t per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0141 t per square kilometre 0.0393 t per square kilometre 0.0252 t per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0232 t per square kilometre 0.0247 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Argentina or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.0193 t per square kilometre against 0.0176 t per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Argentina and Iceland?
0.0017 t per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Iceland rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 127th and Iceland ranks 124th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Iceland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/argentina/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/argentina/iceland/">Argentina vs Iceland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.