Aruba vs Nepal: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Aruba
0.05 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
0.0463 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
103rd
Nepal rank
105th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Nepal
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.05 t per square kilometre against 0.0463 t per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 0.0037 t per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 103rd and Nepal ranks 105th of 173 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0706 t per square kilometre 0.0049 t per square kilometre 0.0657 t per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 0.1339 t per square kilometre 0.0288 t per square kilometre 0.1051 t per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 0.0694 t per square kilometre 0.0625 t per square kilometre 0.0069 t per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Aruba or Nepal?
Aruba, at 0.05 t per square kilometre against 0.0463 t per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Aruba and Nepal?
0.0037 t per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Nepal?
21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Nepal rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 103rd and Nepal ranks 105th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Nepal: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/aruba/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/aruba/nepal/">Aruba vs Nepal: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.