Bahamas vs Zambia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Bahamas
0.0191 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.021 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
125th
Zambia rank
123rd

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zambia
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.021 t per square kilometre against 0.0191 t per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0019 t per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 125th and Zambia ranks 123rd of 173 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0225 t per square kilometre 0.0032 t per square kilometre 0.0193 t per square kilometre Bahamas
1970s 0.039 t per square kilometre 0.0086 t per square kilometre 0.0304 t per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 0.018 t per square kilometre 0.0099 t per square kilometre 0.0081 t per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.01 t per square kilometre 0.0116 t per square kilometre 0.0016 t per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.015 t per square kilometre 0.0146 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0398 t per square kilometre 0.0248 t per square kilometre 0.015 t per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.0206 t per square kilometre 0.0441 t per square kilometre 0.0235 t per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Bahamas or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.021 t per square kilometre against 0.0191 t per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Bahamas and Zambia?
0.0019 t per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zambia?
48 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Zambia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 125th and Zambia ranks 123rd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zambia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/zambia/">Bahamas vs Zambia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.