Botswana vs Chile: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Botswana
0.0057 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
0.0084 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
145th
Chile rank
142nd

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Chile
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0084 t per square kilometre against 0.0057 t per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0027 t per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.5 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Chile ahead.

Botswana ranks 145th and Chile ranks 142nd of 173 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Chile Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0237 t per square kilometre 0.0233 t per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.07 t per square kilometre 0.0697 t per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0651 t per square kilometre 0.0644 t per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0016 t per square kilometre 0.0094 t per square kilometre 0.0078 t per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0031 t per square kilometre 0.0145 t per square kilometre 0.0114 t per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Botswana or Chile?
Chile, at 0.0084 t per square kilometre against 0.0057 t per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Botswana and Chile?
0.0027 t per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Chile?
35 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Chile rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 145th and Chile ranks 142nd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Chile: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/botswana/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/botswana/chile/">Botswana vs Chile: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.