Burundi vs Eswatini: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Burundi
0.1435 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.1737 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
70th
Eswatini rank
67th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Eswatini
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.1737 t per square kilometre against 0.1435 t per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 0.0302 t per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Eswatini ahead.

Burundi ranks 70th and Eswatini ranks 67th of 173 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0581 t per square kilometre 0.0575 t per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0057 t per square kilometre 0.1546 t per square kilometre 0.149 t per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0158 t per square kilometre 0.185 t per square kilometre 0.1693 t per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0142 t per square kilometre 0.1403 t per square kilometre 0.126 t per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0152 t per square kilometre 0.0975 t per square kilometre 0.0823 t per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0931 t per square kilometre 0.1123 t per square kilometre 0.0192 t per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.1435 t per square kilometre 0.1872 t per square kilometre 0.0436 t per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Burundi or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.1737 t per square kilometre against 0.1435 t per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Burundi and Eswatini?
0.0302 t per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Eswatini?
52 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Eswatini rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 70th and Eswatini ranks 67th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Eswatini: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/burundi/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/burundi/eswatini/">Burundi vs Eswatini: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.