Central African Republic vs Mongolia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
163rd
Mongolia rank
163rd

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Mongolia
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 163rd and Mongolia ranks 163rd of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Mongolia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Mongolia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Central African Republic
1980s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0022 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre Mongolia
2000s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Mongolia?
Central African Republic, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Mongolia?
0 t per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mongolia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Mongolia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 163rd and Mongolia ranks 163rd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Mongolia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mongolia/">Central African Republic vs Mongolia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.