Chad vs Congo: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Chad
0.0087 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.0094 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
141st
Congo rank
138th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • Congo
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0094 t per square kilometre against 0.0087 t per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0007 t per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Congo ahead.

Chad ranks 141st and Congo ranks 138th of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Congo Difference Ahead
1970s 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0092 t per square kilometre 0.0082 t per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0035 t per square kilometre 0.0022 t per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.0022 t per square kilometre 0.0031 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0037 t per square kilometre 0.0023 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0054 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0033 t per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.0069 t per square kilometre 0.0073 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Chad or Congo?
Congo, at 0.0094 t per square kilometre against 0.0087 t per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Chad and Congo?
0.0007 t per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Congo?
46 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Chad and Congo rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 141st and Congo ranks 138th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Congo: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/chad/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/chad/congo-rep/">Chad vs Congo: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.