Chile vs Mali: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Chile
0.0084 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
0.0089 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
142nd
Mali rank
140th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Mali
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 0.0089 t per square kilometre against 0.0084 t per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0005 t per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 142nd and Mali ranks 140th of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Mali in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mali Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0176 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre 0.0163 t per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.0207 t per square kilometre 0.0033 t per square kilometre 0.0174 t per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0764 t per square kilometre 0.0067 t per square kilometre 0.0697 t per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0212 t per square kilometre 0.0164 t per square kilometre 0.0048 t per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0094 t per square kilometre 0.0149 t per square kilometre 0.0055 t per square kilometre Mali
2020s 0.0145 t per square kilometre 0.0153 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Chile or Mali?
Mali, at 0.0089 t per square kilometre against 0.0084 t per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Chile and Mali?
0.0005 t per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mali?
49 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mali rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 142nd and Mali ranks 140th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mali: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/chile/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/chile/mali/">Chile vs Mali: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.