Cuba vs Singapore: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Cuba
0.035 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.032 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
113th
Singapore rank
115th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time
- Cuba
- Singapore
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.035 t per square kilometre against 0.032 t per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.003 t per square kilometre.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.
Cuba ranks 113th and Singapore ranks 115th of 173 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7334 t per square kilometre | 1.48 t per square kilometre | 0.7454 t per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 1970s | 1.11 t per square kilometre | 1.64 t per square kilometre | 0.5321 t per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 1980s | 2.02 t per square kilometre | 3.54 t per square kilometre | 1.52 t per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 1990s | 0.7135 t per square kilometre | 2.04 t per square kilometre | 1.33 t per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 2000s | 0.3444 t per square kilometre | 0.1992 t per square kilometre | 0.1452 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.3855 t per square kilometre | 0.3121 t per square kilometre | 0.0735 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.141 t per square kilometre | 0.0352 t per square kilometre | 0.1059 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Cuba or Singapore?
- Cuba, at 0.035 t per square kilometre against 0.032 t per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Cuba and Singapore?
- 0.003 t per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Singapore?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Singapore rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
- Cuba ranks 113th and Singapore ranks 115th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.