French Polynesia vs Iceland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

French Polynesia
0.0184 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0193 t per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
126th
Iceland rank
124th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Iceland
0.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0193 t per square kilometre against 0.0184 t per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0009 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Iceland ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 126th and Iceland ranks 124th of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 5 and Iceland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0567 t per square kilometre 0.0592 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0955 t per square kilometre 0.0572 t per square kilometre 0.0384 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 0.064 t per square kilometre 0.0389 t per square kilometre 0.0251 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 0.0791 t per square kilometre 0.0349 t per square kilometre 0.0441 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 0.055 t per square kilometre 0.0393 t per square kilometre 0.0157 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 0.0443 t per square kilometre 0.0247 t per square kilometre 0.0196 t per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, French Polynesia or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.0193 t per square kilometre against 0.0184 t per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between French Polynesia and Iceland?
0.0009 t per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Iceland?
51 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Iceland rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
French Polynesia ranks 126th and Iceland ranks 124th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Iceland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/iceland/">French Polynesia vs Iceland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.