Guyana vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Guyana
0.0115 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0117 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana rank
136th
Zimbabwe rank
134th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Guyana
  • Zimbabwe
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0117 t per square kilometre against 0.0115 t per square kilometre in Guyana, a difference of 0.0002 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Guyana ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 134th of 173 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.01 t per square kilometre 0.0444 t per square kilometre 0.0345 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0083 t per square kilometre 0.0663 t per square kilometre 0.0581 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0059 t per square kilometre 0.0767 t per square kilometre 0.0708 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0058 t per square kilometre 0.0867 t per square kilometre 0.0809 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0041 t per square kilometre 0.0556 t per square kilometre 0.0516 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.007 t per square kilometre 0.062 t per square kilometre 0.055 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0099 t per square kilometre 0.0105 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Guyana or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0117 t per square kilometre against 0.0115 t per square kilometre in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Guyana and Zimbabwe?
0.0002 t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guyana and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Guyana ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 134th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/guyana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/guyana/zimbabwe/">Guyana vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.