Malta vs Uruguay: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Malta
0.4719 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.4605 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
30th
Uruguay rank
32nd

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Uruguay
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.4719 t per square kilometre against 0.4605 t per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0114 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 30th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 173 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1056 t per square kilometre 0.0232 t per square kilometre 0.0823 t per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0.2109 t per square kilometre 0.028 t per square kilometre 0.1829 t per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.3987 t per square kilometre 0.0168 t per square kilometre 0.382 t per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0.3583 t per square kilometre 0.0439 t per square kilometre 0.3145 t per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.4632 t per square kilometre 0.0218 t per square kilometre 0.4414 t per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.4119 t per square kilometre 0.3109 t per square kilometre 0.101 t per square kilometre Malta
2020s 0.4555 t per square kilometre 0.4056 t per square kilometre 0.0498 t per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Malta or Uruguay?
Malta, at 0.4719 t per square kilometre against 0.4605 t per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Malta and Uruguay?
0.0114 t per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Uruguay?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Uruguay rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 30th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Uruguay: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/malta/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/malta/uruguay/">Malta vs Uruguay: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.