Singapore vs Uganda: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Singapore
0.032 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.0316 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore rank
115th
Uganda rank
116th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

  • Singapore
  • Uganda
01234196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.032 t per square kilometre against 0.0316 t per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0004 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 115th and Uganda ranks 116th of 173 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.48 t per square kilometre 0.0039 t per square kilometre 1.47 t per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 1.49 t per square kilometre 0.0038 t per square kilometre 1.49 t per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 3.73 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 3.73 t per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 1.86 t per square kilometre 0.0024 t per square kilometre 1.86 t per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.1992 t per square kilometre 0.0084 t per square kilometre 0.1908 t per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.3121 t per square kilometre 0.0156 t per square kilometre 0.2965 t per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.0352 t per square kilometre 0.0249 t per square kilometre 0.0102 t per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Singapore or Uganda?
Singapore, at 0.032 t per square kilometre against 0.0316 t per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Singapore and Uganda?
0.0004 t per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Uganda?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Singapore and Uganda rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?
Singapore ranks 115th and Uganda ranks 116th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Uganda: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/singapore/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/singapore/uganda/">Singapore vs Uganda: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,428 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.