Aruba vs Samoa: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Aruba
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Samoa
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Aruba rank
167th
Samoa rank
167th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time
- Aruba
- Samoa
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Samoa, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Samoa ahead.
Aruba ranks 167th and Samoa ranks 167th of 171 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Samoa |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Aruba or Samoa?
- Aruba, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Aruba and Samoa?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Samoa?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Samoa rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
- Aruba ranks 167th and Samoa ranks 167th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.