Australia vs Cuba: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP

Australia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cuba
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Australia rank
62nd
Cuba rank
60th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time

  • Australia
  • Cuba
0000196119922024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Australia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Australia ranks 62nd and Cuba ranks 60th of 171 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Cuba Difference Ahead
1970s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Cuba
1980s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Cuba
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Cuba
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Cuba
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Cuba
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Australia or Cuba?
Cuba, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Australia and Cuba?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cuba?
51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
How do Australia and Cuba rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
Australia ranks 62nd and Cuba ranks 60th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Cuba: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/cuba/">Australia vs Cuba: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 8,237 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.