Bermuda vs Greenland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Bermuda
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Greenland
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Bermuda rank
162nd
Greenland rank
165th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time
- Bermuda
- Greenland
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Greenland, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Bermuda's figure about 4.7 times Greenland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Bermuda ahead.
Bermuda ranks 162nd and Greenland ranks 165th of 171 countries.
Bermuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Bermuda |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Bermuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Bermuda or Greenland?
- Bermuda, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Bermuda and Greenland?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Greenland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Bermuda and Greenland rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
- Bermuda ranks 162nd and Greenland ranks 165th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.