Chile vs Yemen: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Chile
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Yemen
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2018
Chile rank
140th
Yemen rank
141st
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time
- Chile
- Yemen
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Yemen, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 140th and Yemen ranks 141st of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Chile or Yemen?
- Chile, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Yemen as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Chile and Yemen?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Yemen?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Chile and Yemen rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
- Chile ranks 140th and Yemen ranks 141st of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.