Denmark vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP

Denmark
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Denmark rank
90th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
87th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time

  • Denmark
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
00000196119922024

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Denmark, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 90th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 87th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1970s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1980s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Denmark
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Denmark or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Denmark as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Denmark and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Denmark and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
Denmark ranks 90th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 87th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Denmark vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 8,237 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.