Iraq vs Yemen: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Iraq
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Yemen
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2018
Iraq rank
139th
Yemen rank
141st
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time
- Iraq
- Yemen
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Yemen, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.2 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Yemen ahead.
Iraq ranks 139th and Yemen ranks 141st of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Yemen |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Iraq or Yemen?
- Iraq, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Yemen as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Iraq and Yemen?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Yemen?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Iraq and Yemen rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
- Iraq ranks 139th and Yemen ranks 141st of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.