Kiribati vs Tuvalu: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Kiribati
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tuvalu
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kiribati rank
167th
Tuvalu rank
167th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time
- Kiribati
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Kiribati ranks 167th and Tuvalu ranks 167th of 171 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Kiribati or Tuvalu?
- Kiribati, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Kiribati and Tuvalu?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tuvalu?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Tuvalu rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
- Kiribati ranks 167th and Tuvalu ranks 167th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.