Palau vs Singapore: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Palau
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Singapore
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Palau rank
167th
Singapore rank
166th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time
- Palau
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Palau, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Palau ahead.
Palau ranks 167th and Singapore ranks 166th of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Palau averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Palau | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Palau |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Palau |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Palau or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Palau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Palau and Singapore?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Singapore?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Palau and Singapore rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
- Palau ranks 167th and Singapore ranks 166th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.