Belgium vs Morocco: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use over time
- Belgium
- Morocco
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 50,000 t against 49,541 t in Morocco, a difference of 459 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 56th and Morocco ranks 57th of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75,249 t | 59,479 t | 15,770 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 64,392 t | 68,663 t | 4,272 t | Morocco |
| 2020s | 52,000 t | 72,046 t | 20,046 t | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, Belgium or Morocco?
- Belgium, at 50,000 t against 49,541 t in Morocco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use between Belgium and Morocco?
- 459 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Morocco?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Morocco rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use?
- Belgium ranks 56th and Morocco ranks 57th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf