Bhutan vs Namibia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use over time
- Bhutan
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 343 t against 237 t in Bhutan, a difference of 106 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 166th and Namibia ranks 164th of 210 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 164.62 t | 169.38 t | 4.75 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 196.1 t | 392 t | 195.9 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 196.4 t | 239.8 t | 43.4 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, Bhutan or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 343 t against 237 t in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use between Bhutan and Namibia?
- 106 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Namibia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Namibia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use?
- Bhutan ranks 166th and Namibia ranks 164th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf