Eswatini vs Georgia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use over time
- Eswatini
- Georgia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 3,834 t against 3,731 t in Georgia, a difference of 103 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 122nd and Georgia ranks 124th of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,677 t | 796.6 t | 880.4 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1,931 t | 1,944 t | 12.3 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 3,342 t | 3,559 t | 216.8 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, Eswatini or Georgia?
- Eswatini, at 3,834 t against 3,731 t in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use between Eswatini and Georgia?
- 103 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Georgia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Georgia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use?
- Eswatini ranks 122nd and Georgia ranks 124th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf