Ethiopia vs Qatar: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use over time
- Ethiopia
- Qatar
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 2,672 t against 2,420 t in Qatar, a difference of 252 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Qatar ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 133rd and Qatar ranks 136th of 210 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 1,031 t | 1,901 t | 869.62 t | Qatar |
| 2020s | 1,730 t | 2,378 t | 648.8 t | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, Ethiopia or Qatar?
- Ethiopia, at 2,672 t against 2,420 t in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use between Ethiopia and Qatar?
- 252 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Qatar?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Ethiopia and Qatar rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use?
- Ethiopia ranks 133rd and Qatar ranks 136th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf