Georgia vs Guyana: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use over time
- Georgia
- Guyana
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 3,731 t against 3,658 t in Guyana, a difference of 73 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 112th and Guyana ranks 114th of 195 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 845.67 t | 799.22 t | 46.44 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 1,944 t | 1,375 t | 568.3 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 3,559 t | 2,401 t | 1,158 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, Georgia or Guyana?
- Georgia, at 3,731 t against 3,658 t in Guyana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use between Georgia and Guyana?
- 73 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Guyana?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Guyana rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use?
- Georgia ranks 112th and Guyana ranks 114th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf