Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Polynesia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
672,511 t
in 2024
Polynesia
80 t
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
16th
Polynesia rank
17th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Polynesia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 672,511 t against 80 t in Polynesia, a difference of 672,431 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 8,406.4 times Polynesia's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th and Polynesia ranks 17th of 29 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Polynesia Difference Ahead
1970s 45,613 t 212.14 t 45,401 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 61,806 t 376.3 t 61,430 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 164,815 t 234.2 t 164,581 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 223,993 t 303.7 t 223,689 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 389,127 t 275.8 t 388,851 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 599,914 t 182.6 t 599,732 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Polynesia?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 672,511 t against 80 t in Polynesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Polynesia?
672,431 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Polynesia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Polynesia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th and Polynesia ranks 17th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Polynesia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/polynesia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Polynesia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 12,259 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf