Congo vs Uganda: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Export quantity
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Export quantity over time
- Congo
- Uganda
How they compare
Congo currently reports 18 t against 17 t in Uganda, a difference of 1 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 112th and Uganda ranks 114th of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 153.4 t | 0.5 t | 152.9 t | Congo |
| 2000s | 46.1 t | 21.5 t | 24.6 t | Congo |
| 2010s | 48.2 t | 2.8 t | 45.4 t | Congo |
| 2020s | 43.4 t | 239.6 t | 196.2 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — export quantity, Congo or Uganda?
- Congo, at 18 t against 17 t in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — export quantity between Congo and Uganda?
- 1 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Uganda rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — export quantity?
- Congo ranks 112th and Uganda ranks 114th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf