Aruba vs Tuvalu: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Aruba
0 t
in 2024
Tuvalu
0 t
in 2024
Aruba rank
205th
Tuvalu rank
205th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Aruba
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Aruba ranks 205th and Tuvalu ranks 205th of 216 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2000s | 0 t | 4.9 t | 4.9 t | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 0.5 t | 0.5 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0.2 t | 1.2 t | 1 t | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Aruba or Tuvalu?
- Aruba, at 0 t against 0 t in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Aruba and Tuvalu?
- 0 t, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Tuvalu?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Tuvalu rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Aruba ranks 205th and Tuvalu ranks 205th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity with 83 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.