Barbados vs Sao Tome and Principe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Barbados
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 70 t against 58 t in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 12 t.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 186th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 189th of 216 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,000 t | 0 t | 1,000 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 244 t | 16.8 t | 227.2 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 176.2 t | 32.6 t | 143.6 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 42 t | 55.6 t | 13.6 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Barbados or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Barbados, at 70 t against 58 t in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 12 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Barbados ranks 186th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 189th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity with 83 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.