Belize vs Cuba: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Belize
2,301 t
in 2024
Cuba
2,531 t
in 2024
Belize rank
138th
Cuba rank
136th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Belize
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 2,531 t against 2,301 t in Belize, a difference of 230 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Belize ranks 138th and Cuba ranks 136th of 216 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 156.33 t | 78,497 t | 78,341 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 261.3 t | 125,656 t | 125,394 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 871.8 t | 218,500 t | 217,628 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 1,590 t | 73,900 t | 72,310 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 1,292 t | 37,836 t | 36,544 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 3,906 t | 40,301 t | 36,394 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 3,708 t | 3,830 t | 121.6 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Belize or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 2,531 t against 2,301 t in Belize as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Belize and Cuba?
- 230 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Cuba?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Belize and Cuba rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Belize ranks 138th and Cuba ranks 136th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity with 83 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.