Central Asia vs Latvia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Central Asia
18,549 t
in 2024
Latvia
55,780 t
in 2024
Central Asia rank
60th
Latvia rank
59th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Central Asia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 55,780 t against 18,549 t in Central Asia, a difference of 37,231 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 3.0 times Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 59th of 60 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 78,318 t | 25,919 t | 52,399 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 25,299 t | 18,716 t | 6,582 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 18,871 t | 34,195 t | 15,324 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 19,883 t | 47,323 t | 27,440 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Central Asia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 55,780 t against 18,549 t in Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Central Asia and Latvia?
- 37,231 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Central Asia and Latvia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Central Asia ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 59th of 60 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity with 83 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.