Costa Rica vs Lithuania: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Costa Rica
109,315 t
in 2024
Lithuania
103,559 t
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
41st
Lithuania rank
42nd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Costa Rica
- Lithuania
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 109,315 t against 103,559 t in Lithuania, a difference of 5,756 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 41st and Lithuania ranks 42nd of 216 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48,660 t | 37,628 t | 11,032 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 64,234 t | 93,211 t | 28,977 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 44,888 t | 95,907 t | 51,019 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 69,988 t | 117,087 t | 47,100 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Costa Rica or Lithuania?
- Costa Rica, at 109,315 t against 103,559 t in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Lithuania?
- 5,756 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Lithuania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Lithuania rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Costa Rica ranks 41st and Lithuania ranks 42nd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity with 83 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.