Guatemala vs Serbia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Guatemala
102,417 t
in 2024
Serbia
102,661 t
in 2024
Guatemala rank
44th
Serbia rank
43rd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Guatemala
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 102,661 t against 102,417 t in Guatemala, a difference of 244 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Guatemala ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 43rd of 216 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25,146 t | 60,589 t | 35,444 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 56,898 t | 64,925 t | 8,027 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 85,505 t | 90,760 t | 5,255 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Guatemala or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 102,661 t against 102,417 t in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Guatemala and Serbia?
- 244 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Serbia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Guatemala ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 43rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity with 83 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.