Lithuania vs Serbia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Lithuania
103,559 t
in 2024
Serbia
102,661 t
in 2024
Lithuania rank
42nd
Serbia rank
43rd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Lithuania
- Serbia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 103,559 t against 102,661 t in Serbia, a difference of 898 t.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 43rd of 216 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91,681 t | 60,589 t | 31,092 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 95,907 t | 64,925 t | 30,982 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 117,087 t | 90,760 t | 26,327 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Lithuania or Serbia?
- Lithuania, at 103,559 t against 102,661 t in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Lithuania and Serbia?
- 898 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Serbia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Lithuania ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 43rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity with 83 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.