Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre

Congo
0.0098 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0115 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
132nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
129th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0115 t per square kilometre against 0.0098 t per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0017 t per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 132nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 129th of 173 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0038 t per square kilometre 2.76 t per square kilometre 2.76 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0 t per square kilometre 3.43 t per square kilometre 3.43 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0035 t per square kilometre 4.49 t per square kilometre 4.48 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0031 t per square kilometre 1.23 t per square kilometre 1.23 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0012 t per square kilometre 0.4169 t per square kilometre 0.4157 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0022 t per square kilometre 0.0342 t per square kilometre 0.032 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0078 t per square kilometre 0.0115 t per square kilometre 0.0037 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, per square kilometre, Congo or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0115 t per square kilometre against 0.0098 t per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, per square kilometre between Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0017 t per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 132nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 129th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-import-quantity-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-import-quantity-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,859 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.