Cuba vs Finland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre

Cuba
0.0268 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.0255 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
114th
Finland rank
115th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Finland
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.0268 t per square kilometre against 0.0255 t per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0013 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 114th and Finland ranks 115th of 173 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Finland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7309 t per square kilometre 0.3541 t per square kilometre 0.3768 t per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 1.17 t per square kilometre 0.5308 t per square kilometre 0.6391 t per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 2.03 t per square kilometre 0.7052 t per square kilometre 1.33 t per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.6881 t per square kilometre 0.5161 t per square kilometre 0.172 t per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.3548 t per square kilometre 0.6026 t per square kilometre 0.2478 t per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.3842 t per square kilometre 0.189 t per square kilometre 0.1952 t per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.04 t per square kilometre 0.0631 t per square kilometre 0.023 t per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, per square kilometre, Cuba or Finland?
Cuba, at 0.0268 t per square kilometre against 0.0255 t per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, per square kilometre between Cuba and Finland?
0.0013 t per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Finland rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 114th and Finland ranks 115th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Finland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-import-quantity-per-square-kilometre/cuba/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-import-quantity-per-square-kilometre/cuba/finland/">Cuba vs Finland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,859 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.