Libya vs Luxembourg: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity over time
- Libya
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 1,781 t against 1,721 t in Libya, a difference of 60 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 134th and Luxembourg ranks 132nd of 199 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,582 t | 4,167 t | 1,585 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1,178 t | 2,896 t | 1,718 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 1,936 t | 1,679 t | 257 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity, Libya or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 1,781 t against 1,721 t in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity between Libya and Luxembourg?
- 60 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Luxembourg rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — import quantity?
- Libya ranks 134th and Luxembourg ranks 132nd of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf